The Secret Doctrine
Every teaching should have its doctrine, I would like to say. But, as it turns out, it doesn’t. If this doctrine is interpreted by people who do not participate in the very process of cognition; people who are not part of this doctrine; people who are seen by the very doctrine as marginal, i.e. holding different views and therefore possessing different standpoints, then we can claim that this doctrine is absent.
Every experience and symbolism questions the idea of the doctrine. It’s like a key but a key to a reserve or to one of the doors in a secret maze. Every entrance to it lies beyond the threshold of the secret knowledge or even simply knowledge. If you do not possess knowledge it all becomes artificial, not alive. It is, so to speak, for the dead; but how about the living?
You must be able to distinguish the keys from the secrets. After all, to some people this may be a hidden meaning, and to others - inanimate folklore, at best. Because in fact, nothing is simple. Only a simple mind would adapt things to itself so that they become clear and simple. For the complex mind this is something temporary, linear, and hence non-existent. And all that exists is difficult because it is a formula.
It is difficult to search for the alive in the midst of the dead, if only not to arouse mystical interest. Because if something is but is not here, then it is a fairytale, if it is here by is not, then it is a shadow lying beyond the limits of alleged secrets. So we need a witness. But what would he testify to? This is not a literary romance but a specific craft. The doctrine is a specific craft. If you didn’t hear something in particular, you may indulge in a number of interpretations based on the gift of understanding.
And now an extra illustration: the doctrine is not archeology because it does not allow for the picking of certain facts and does not fill in gaps in history. The doctrine is a fact. A fact outlined by a horizon. And if someone cannot see, this does not deprive the doctrine of its right to be absent. The doctrine cannot be present all the time, or else it would not be a doctrine. It needs to be alone sometimes and, so to speak, to meditate, for the very process of meditating is the doctrine itself. When we have a mediator like meditation we are in the history of doctrine. By definition, this is kind of cool; and in fact, it is at best an expectation for the beginning of the real approach to the true goal. And meanwhile… Meanwhile you are a false object.
We can do something important in the past and something important in the future. However, this would not be something important now. What is important now is to understand if there was a ritual, i.e. if there was a connecting of the self to the now. Otherwise, you might turn into an indefatigable patient with an indefatigable spirit. Naturally, this would lead to some sort of suspension however it would not lead to an inquiry. It is dangerous to study the great and to suddenly realize you have not yet understood the not-great. Of course, nothing happens at first; but then comes the violent attrition. And the most important question is how can we develop the great? Even in our head? What should we examine? Those who look dawn upon this are very likely to fall. We get something similar to Aaron’s rod… And then, there will always be people who will feel offended.
What I actually wanted to say was: ‘sanctify the mind, or you may start flowering.’ What would be better for the brain is a small tree on an inaccessible hill. Something at a remote but accessible distance, otherwise the brain can get impeached or become a monument of antiquity. You cannot find a perfect term here, and the offers keep coming. What is the historical significance of a doctrine? To make the person glitch? But how can this be done if everyone plays for himself, and every self is the result of someone's imagination? What we get is some kind of fantasy. Between these gulfs on both sides of the hemispheres it proves difficult to be a historian, and impossible to be an alchemist.
How can you find the essence of the text if the essence is not in the text? You don’t know? Then why are there so many applications for scholarships? We can allow this however exactness will lead to deviation. And there can be no sympathy with such aspirations and deviations. Thus we have something similar to ‘don’t bother our people’ but take a bow in St Mary’s church.
Perhaps God created Adam from dust but there was also a lot of useless stuff. Apparently, the seeds were spread far and out yet they either withered or got damp so he had to resort to synthesis. Something like grafting. Why do we need all the passwords and signs then, when the enhancement of moral depends on the courage to love God?/P>
It is true however that some names attract, indoctrinate, so to speak. Therefore, they can be solemnly decorated. The materialization of such a presentation is analogous to the Android project. Who is in charge – you or the Android? Becoming Tetris in the hands of the Android, we simply receive an equivalent. An equivalent looking for real things. Can you imagine this? No, and nomenclature requires faith. Moreover, this happens in circumstances when the right to a measure of respect is already an ancient tablet that perhaps no one can decipher. What is left, of course, is the natural goodness for natural purposes. And if you don’t know where to turn, then my thesis is addressed to Caesar. The smaller the things, the longer the path.
So, the brick is no friend to the silicone. What is more, what will the fish-mongers say? And the winemakers? We need an association in defence of the general, let’s call it the Buffalo Order. Why? Because there must be civil distinction. And something must be offered… Perhaps a society of the antediluvians. Or generally the taxpayers. All this is anyway a good reason to start moving in the right direction. Initiating eternal life, comrades, brothers and sisters, neighbors!
And now the most relevant issues of the Secret Doctrine. The doctrine, if it exists, must be secret, otherwise it is not a doctrine but a quest for eternal life. If we assume this argument is wrong, the consequences would be nil. And even those who are familiar with the rituals can not step in and say that the ritual is a procedure because this would violate the order and the documents that prove it will be burned. In general, with such a clear issue as the secret doctrine, there shouldn’t be anything that would hinder this clear realization.
 |
 |
 |
 | |
| ORDER THE BOOK DZYABYAK | ORDER THE BOOKS TEMPLAR. MEASURE and TEMPLAR. RITUAL | TAKE PART IN THE TOUR RITUAL – THE NORTH ERN CORNER OF AVALON |
18 march 2014
RSS: